Appeal No. 2004-0915 Page 11
Application No. 09/919,469
view of Wareing and Graham are sustained, the rejection of claims 4-11, 14 and 15 as
being unpatentable over Spencer in view of Wareing is sustained as to claims 4, 7, 8,
10, 14 and 15 and reversed as to claims 5, 6, 9 and 11 and the rejection of claim 13 as
being unpatentable over Spencer in view of Wareing and Groth is reversed. The
examiner’s decision is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
LAWRENCE J. STAAB )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007