Appeal No. 2004-0943 Application No. 09/460,930 inherently, using run-length codes, the examiner has not carried the burden of establishing a prima facie case of anticipation of the inventions claimed in the appellant’s claims 1-7 and 9. As for claim 8, the examiner presents no argument as to how Moronaga would have fairly suggested using run-length codes to one of ordinary skill in the art. The examiner, therefore, has not established a prima facie case of obviousness of the invention claimed in the appellant’s claim 8. 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007