Ex Parte Calvesio et al - Page 1



             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                      publication and is not binding precedent of the Board           
                         Paper No. 18                                                 
                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                               ______________________                                 
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                               ______________________                                 
                            Ex parte RAYMOND V. CALVESIO                              
                                  and JOHN A. OLSON                                   
                               ______________________                                 
                                Appeal No. 2004-0960                                  
                             Application No. 09/750,394                               
                                 ______________________                               
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                 ______________________                               

          Before OWENS, DIXON and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                
          OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-20,                
          which are all of the claims in the application.                             

                                    THE INVENTION                                     
               The appellants claim a system and method for maintaining               
          access control to high security zones.  Claim 1, which claims the           

                                          1                                           




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007