The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JAFAR NABKEL, KAREN SIEGEL-JACOBS,
HARVEY J. BENSON, EDWARD A. YOUNGS,
DONALD E. GILLESPIE, MARK S. MAIZE,
and MARK W. HARDISON
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0961
Application No. 09/785,863
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-5, 8-16,
19-27 and 30-38, which are all of the claims pending in the
application.
THE INVENTION
The appellants claim a method and system for providing
preselected information services to a telephone subscriber.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007