The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte STEVEN L. WEBB, EUGENE W. PAKENHAM, MARTHA A. CHAVEZ,
and JEFFREY P. LEE
_____________
Appeal No. 2004-0962
Application No. 09/234,255
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 10. In an Amendment After Final (paper number 18),
claim 10 was amended.
The disclosed invention relates to a progress monitor that
progressively reveals information as the progress indicator
becomes larger.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007