Ex Parte Yurchak et al - Page 8




              Appeal No. 2004-0973                                                                                       
              Application No. 09/898,155                                                                                 
                                                    CONCLUSION                                                           
                     The rejection of claims 16, 17 and 19-25 under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as anticipated                      
              by Hoffman is affirmed.  The rejection of claims 16 and 18 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as                       
              obvious in view of Hoffman is affirmed.                                                                    
                     The rejection claims 16-25  under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as obvious in view of                            
              Shlyankevich is reversed.                                                                                  
                     The rejection of claims 16 -25 under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as obvious in view of Night                   
              Song is reversed.                                                                                          
























                                                           8                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007