The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 28
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RAJARAN RAMESH and
GREGORY E. BOTTOMLEY
____________
Appeal No. 2004-0991
Application No. 09/152,063
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and KRASS, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal of the rejection of claims 25 through 27, 29
through 37, 39, 40, 42 through 46 and 48. Claims 28, 38, 41 and 47
have been objected to as depending from rejected base claims, but
would be allowable if rewritten in independent claim form including
all of the limitations of the base claims and any intervening
claims.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007