The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
______________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
______________________
Ex parte MATT HENDRICKSON, ROB JOSE
AND KEN WLENS
______________________
Appeal No. 2004-1003
Application No. 09/728,250
______________________
ON BRIEF
______________________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-33 and 38-46. Claims
34-37 have been indicated by the examiner as being directed to allowable subject matter and are
not before us on appeal.
The invention pertains to electronic resumes. In particular, the invention is said to allow
a user to dynamically change the style of an online resume. A user selects a resume style from a
plurality of resume styles. Each style has a corresponding style sheet describing the style. A
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007