Ex Parte Correa et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-1009                                                        
          Application No. 09/785,382                                 Page 2           


                    1. A hand held hair blow dryer apparatus                          
               comprising:                                                            
                    a linearly elongated grappling handle aligned along a             
               base of a lateral centerline of a dryer;                               
                    a directional head extending from said handle                     
               along said lateral centerline, said directional head                   
               having an angularly disposed directional nozzle                        
               directed perpendicularly from said lateral centerline;                 
                    an air outlet port formed at a center of said                     
               nozzle and circumscribed by a peripheral rim;                          
                    said directional head supporting heating coils and                
               enclosing said blower; and                                             
                    brush attachment attached about said peripheral                   
               rim covering said air outlet port and attached to said                 
               head by brush attachment means.                                        

               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Vallis                        3,949,765           Apr. 13, 1976             
          Braulke, III (Braulke)        4,114,022           Sep. 12, 1978             
          Weiss                         4,365,141           Dec. 21, 1982             
          Scivoletto                    4,955,145           Sep. 11, 1990             
          Barr, Jr. (Barr)              5,485,931           Jan. 23, 1996             
          Sampson et al. (Sampson)1     6,364,165           Apr. 02, 2002             
               Claims 1 and 3-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as            
          being anticipated by Vallis.  Claim 2 stands rejected under                 
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Vallis in view of             
          Weiss.  Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being           
          unpatentable over Vallis in view of Scivoletto.  Claims 7 and 16            

               1 Appellants have not challenged the availability of this              
          reference as prior art under § 102(e) based on the parent                   
          application (09/488,209) filing date of January 19, 2000 and/or             
          the earlier provisional application (60/116,407) filing date of             
          January 19, 1999.                                                           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007