Appeal No. 2004-1021
Application No. 09/707,450
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of independent claims 3 and 13, and dependent
claims 4, 14, 20 through 23 and 25 as being unpatentable over
Wycech in view of Wieting.
IV. The 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claim 26 as being
unpatentable over Wycech in view of Wieting and Bolduc
As Bolduc does not overcome the foregoing deficiencies of
the Wycech and Wieting combination relative to the subject matter
recited in parent claim 13, we shall not sustain the standing 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claim 26 as being
unpatentable over Wycech in view of Wieting and Bolduc.
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007