The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today was not written for publication and is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
Ex parte JERILYN L. MARLER and MARY J. LALOMIA
Appeal No. 2004-1063
Application No. 09/273,385
ON BRIEF
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent
Judges.
KRASS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-20.
The invention is directed to the control of processor-based
systems. In particular, a plurality of selectable options is
displayed and the selectable options are automatically and
consecutively indicated in a timed sequence. When one of the
-1–
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007