The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ASHOK RAMESH SANADI
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1065
Application No. 09/883,804
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before OWENS, JEFFREY T. SMITH and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative
Patent Judges.
PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner’s final rejection of claims 32 and 33.1 A copy of each
of the these claims is set forth below:
32. A device for holding specimens in a plurality
of chambers, said device comprising:
a single-piece unitary body;
1 We note that appellant’s Appendix to the brief incorrectly identifies
claims 32 and 33 as claims 1 and 2. We refer to the claims as claims 32 and
33.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007