Appeal No. 2004-1074
Application No. 09/924,772
in view of Okamoto and Belopolsky, the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 10 and 19 as being
unpatentable over Cohen in view of Okamoto and Shepherd, the
standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 12 and
21 as being unpatentable over Cohen in view of Okamoto and Ward,
or the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims
11 and 20 as being unpatentable over Cohen in view of Okamoto,
Shepherd and Legrady.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1 through 21
is reversed.
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007