Appeal No. 2004-1078
Application No. 09/765,121
1 on appeal appears in the Appendix to appellants' brief (Paper
No. 10).
The prior art references of record relied upon by the
examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
White, Jr., et al. 3,853,017 Dec. 10, 1974
(White)
Wolfe 4,022,070 May 10, 1977
Benedict et al. 6,066,188 May 23, 2000
(Benedict)
Claims 1, 2, 5 through 8 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(a) as being anticipated by Benedict.
Claims 3 and 4 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Benedict in view of White.
Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Benedict in view of Wolfe.
Claim 11 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Benedict.
22
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007