Ex Parte LEE - Page 2


         Appeal No. 2004-1087                                                       
         Application No. 09/223,472                                                 

                   1. A method of applying a material onto a                        
              substrate surface, comprising:                                        
                   exposing a surface of a substrate to a liquid,                   
              containing a material, in an enclosure; and                           
                   directing more of the liquid from an outlet                      
              which, when viewed from the front, is off-center from                 
              a central axis of the substrate normal to the surface,                
              and, when viewed from the right, is at an angle other                 
              than normal to the surface so that the liquid flows                   
              rotationally over the surface about the central axis,                 
              the material depositing on the surface.                               
                                                                                   
              As an initial matter, we note that on page 2 of the answer,           
         the examiner has indicated that claims 25, 26 and 32 are                   
         objected to, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent            
         form.                                                                      
              The examiner relies upon the following references as                  
         evidence of unpatentability:                                               
         Norris                  4,151,062               Apr. 24, 1979            
         Eidschun                4,443,304               Apr. 17, 1984            
         Mori                    5,443,707               Aug. 22, 1995            

              Claim 33 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112 second                 
         paragraph (indefiniteness).                                                
              Claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 18, 19, 22, 23, 27, 29, and 30 stand               
         rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                  
         Norris.                                                                    
              Claims 1-5, 18-24 and 27-31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.            
         § 103 as being unpatentable Mori in view of Norris.                        
              Claims 1, 3-5, 18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 27, 29, 30, and 31             
         stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by            
         Edischun.                                                                  
              Claims 21 and 28 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as              
         being unpatentable over Edischun.                                          

                                         2                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007