The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MIKIHIRO IKAWA ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1099 Application No. 09/868,911 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before OWENS, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s final rejection of claims 15 through 26, which are the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134. According to appellant, the invention is directed to a method and an apparatus for processing a linear groove in a resin skin (Brief, page 3). A more detailed understanding of the invention may be gleaned from representative independent claims 15 (method) and 18 (apparatus) as found in the Appendix to appellants’ Brief.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007