The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 13 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte BEV WOLFGRAM ______________ Appeal No. 2004-1108 Application 09/756,833 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WARREN, KRATZ and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on Appeal This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 18, all of the claims in the application. Claims 1, 2 and 14 are illustrative of the claims on appeal: 1. A backpack specifically adapted to contain and carry a scooter vehicle, said backpack comprising: a rigid back support plate forms a linearly elongated vertical support and having a lower end, an upper end, and a vertical centerline along the vertically elongated midline; a rigid bottom support plate perpendicularly affixed at said lower end of said back support plate; a continuous, flexible sidewalk extending outward from and connected to said bottom support plate and said back support plate, thereby forming a frontwall parallel to said back support plate and pair of spaced, vertical sides separating said back support plate from said frontwall such as to form an internal storage volume, - 1 -Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007