Appeal No. 2004-1112 Page 7 Application No. 09/829,707 of the saccharase enzyme complex,” which “delays the digestion of ingested carbohydrates.” Pages 1 and 4. The other required component of the claimed composition, a sustained release matrix, is disclosed to “provide[] substantially constant release of acarbose over a pre-determined period of time.” Page 2. Thus, we conclude that the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition are (1) inhibition of the saccharase enzyme complex, (2) over an extended period of time. The basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition do not include inhibition of lipase enzymes. Thus, the addition of a lipase inhibitor would materially affect the basic and novel characteristics of the claimed composition. The claims do not read on the compositions disclosed by Bremer, which all contain a lipase inhibitor. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is reversed. 3. Patel The examiner rejected claims 15-27 as anticipated by Patel, on the basis that Patel discloses a pharmaceutical composition that comprises surfactants and a hydrophilic therapeutic agent (see abstract), whereby the hydrophilic therapeutic agent may be selected as acarbose (see column 31, lines 57 and 58). Patel . . . discloses that the pharmaceutical compositions may be in dosage forms, whereby the dosage forms can be designed for extended release, which can be [e]ffected by a coated matrix composition. . . . [E]xamples of cellulose derivatives that can be used to form the coating composition . . . [include] hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose succinate. Examiner’s Answer, page 3. Appellant argues that Patel does not anticipate claims 15-27 because, among other things, Patel does not disclose a formulation combining acarbosePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007