The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS A. KIST, BURN L. LEWIS, and BRUCE D. LUCAS ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1117 Application No. 09/348,425 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before FLEMING, GROSS, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 22 through 31, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to a speech recognition system which identifies a voice command component specified by a command grammar and a dictation component not specified by the command grammar and executes the voice command component using the dictation component as an execution parameter of the voice command. Claim 22 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007