The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte BURKHARD KÖHLER, JOACHIM PROBST and MICHAEL SONNTAG ______________ Appeal No. 2004-1131 Application 09/562,632 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before PAK, WARREN and TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge. Decision on Appeal This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the decision of the examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 7, all of the claims in the application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the claims on appeal: 1. A coating composition comprising a) 30 to 95 wt.% of an aqueous, hydroxy-functional, acid-group containing resin dispersion, b) 5 to 70 wt.% of a polyisocyanate component having a free isocyanate group content of 5 to 50 wt.% and a viscosity of 5 to 10,000 mPa.s at 23°C and D = 40s-1 and c) 0.1 to 10 wt.% of a silane component, inert to isocyanate groups, of the general formula (|) - 1 -Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007