The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TIM WOLLASTON, RICHARD PEDWELL
and PAUL BUSH
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1150
Application No. 09/924,490
____________
HEARD: July 13, 2004
____________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s non-final
action (Paper No. 5) wherein claims 1, 13, 14, 18, 20, 37-39, 41,
43, 45, 50, 52, 54, 56, 57, 59 and 66 were rejected for a second
time. Claims 16, 32, 33, 40, 42, 44, 46-49, 51, 53, 55, 58 and
60-65, the only other claims currently pending in the application,
have been indicated by the examiner to contain allowable subject
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007