Appeal No. 2004-1154
Application No. 09/247,219
As a final point, we note that appellant bases no arguments
upon objective evidence of nonobviousness, such as unexpected
results, which would serve to rebut the inference of obviousness
established by the examiner.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, and the reasons
well-stated by the examiner, the examiner's decision rejecting
the appealed claims is affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
EDWARD C. KIMLIN )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
THOMAS A. WALTZ ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JEFFREY T. SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
ECK/vsh
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007