The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 9
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WEBB T. NELSON
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1197
Application No. 10/041,430
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1
through 17, all of the claims remaining in the application.
Appellant's invention pertains to a novelty device and to a
method of operation for a novelty device. A basic understanding
of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary
claims 1, 10, and 17, respective copies of which appear in the
APPENDIX of the brief (Paper No. 6).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007