Ex Parte Schmitz - Page 1




                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                    
                                      for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                            

                                                                                                  Paper No. 22              

                                UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                       ____________                                                         
                                     BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                       ____________                                                         
                                              Ex parte JEFFREY F. SCHMITZ                                                   
                                                       ____________                                                         
                                                   Appeal No. 2004-1207                                                     
                                                Application No. 09/759,411                                                  
                                                       ____________                                                         
                                               HEARD: DECEMBER 8, 2004                                                      
                                                       ____________                                                         
              Before COHEN, NASE and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                    
              BAHR, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            



                                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     Appellant originally appealed from the examiner's rejection of claims 1-21, which                      
              are all of the claims pending in this application.   At the oral hearing, appellant’s                         
              counsel, Mr. Steven C. Schnedler, withdrew the appeal of the rejections of claims 18-                         
              21.  In accordance with Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) § 1215.03,                                
              such withdrawal operates as an authorization to cancel those claims from the                                  
              application and the appeal continues with respect to claims 1-17.  Claims 18-21 will be                       








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007