The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARSENE ROTH and JEAN VIAUD
____________
Appeal No. 2004-1211
Application No. 09/945,418
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, KRATZ and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-10 which are all of the claims in the application. On
page 3 of the answer, the Examiner has indicated that claims 2-10
now stand objected to as being dependent upon rejected claim 1 but
otherwise allowable. Therefore, we hereby dismiss the appeal as to
claims 2-10, thus leaving independent claim 1 as the sole claim
before us.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007