Ex Parte Schramek - Page 12



          Appeal No. 2004-1224                                                        
          Application No. 09/532,379                                                  
                                      APPENDIX                                        
               1. A method for efficiently and accurately measuring the               
          progress of achieving optimal motor vehicle characteristics that            
          are important to customer satisfaction, the method comprising:              
               gathering internal organizational data;                                
               gathering external organizational data;                                
               matching the internal organizational data with the external            
          organizational data to create a first list of characteristics,              
          wherein the first list of characteristics comprises                         
          characteristics gathered from the internal and external                     
          organizational data that are valued by customers according to an            
          organizational point of view;                                               
               performing a plurality of tests to determine test                      
          characteristics, wherein the test characteristics are determined            
          from vehicles having a best-in-class rating such that the best-             
          in-class ratings indicate the test characteristics that are                 
          valued by customers according to one or more publications;                  
               matching the test characteristics with the first list of               
          characteristics to create a second list of characteristics,                 
          wherein the second list of characteristics comprises the                    
          characteristics of the first list that correspond with the test             
          characteristics such that the characteristics in the second list            
          are valued by customers according to the organizational point of            
          view and according to one or more publications;                             
               defining a stop designation for each characteristic of the             
          second list, the stop designation including a range of values               
          which define performance levels which require repair;                       
               defining a caution designation for each characteristic of              
          the second list by establishing a range of values, the caution              
          designation including a range of values which define performance            
          levels which may be improved;                                               
               defining a go designation for each characteristic of the               
          second list, the go designation including a range of values which           
          define performance levels are acceptable;                                   
                                          1                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007