Appeal No. 2004-1254
Application No. 09/625,884
sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 1, 7,
11, 13, 17 and 22, and dependent claims 2 through 5, 8 through
10, 12, 14 through 16, 18 through 20 and 23, as being
unpatentable over Fey in view of Ugawa.
As the examiner’s application of Bridgeman does not cure the
flaws in the Fey-Ugawa combination relative to the subject matter
recited in parent claims 13 and 17, we also shall not sustain the
standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of dependent claims 24
through 27 as being unpatentable over Fey in view of Ugawa and
Bridgeman.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007