Appeal No. 2004-1287
Application 09/211,410 Page 9
appellants have specified that all of the appealed claims stand or
fall together and do not argue the additional features set forth in
any of dependent claims 11, 12 or 13 as patentably distinguishing
over the applied references. Consequently, we shall also affirm the
§ 103(a) rejection of claims 11-13 on this record.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 3, 6-10, 14 and
16-21 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Visser in
view of Law and to reject claims 11-13 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Visser in view of Law and Fitzgerald is
affirmed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007