The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte WILLIAM K. STOUT, JR.
___________
Appeal No. 2004-1305
Application No. 29/138,829
__________
ON BRIEF
_________
Before PAK, WALTZ, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the primary examiner’s
final rejection of the single design claim 1. We have
jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 134.
According to appellant, the invention is directed to the
ornamental design for a duct with an indented end as shown and
described in Figures 1 through 6 submitted with the Requests for
Authorization to Amend the Drawings dated September 17, 2002, and
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007