Ex Parte CHISNELL - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-1361                                                        
          Application No. 09/430,574                                                  
               1.  A tubular connection, comprising:                                  
               a female connecting block having an end surface, an opposite           
          end surface, and a throughbore therebetween, said throughbore               
          having a chamfer at said end surface, said chamfer and said                 
          throughbore intersecting to define a transition surface; and                
               a tube mounted in said throughbore of said female connecting           
          block, said tube having a tapered portion that is seated against            
          said transition surface of said female connecting block, said               
          tapered portion terminating in an end-form.                                 
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 2 and 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as           
          being anticipated by U.S. Pat. No. 5,174,612 to Schnell.                    
               Attention is directed to the brief (Paper No. 17) and to the           
          final rejection and answer (Paper Nos. 13 and 19) for the                   
          respective positions of the appellant and the examiner regarding            
          the merits of these rejections.                                             

                                     DISCUSSION                                       
               Anticipation is established only when a single prior art               
          reference discloses, expressly or under principles of inherency,            
          each and every element of a claimed invention.  RCA Corp. v.                
          Applied Digital Data Sys., Inc., 730 F.2d 1440, 1444, 221 USPQ              
          385, 388 (Fed. Cir. 1984).  It is not necessary that the                    
          reference teach what the subject application teaches, but only              
          that the claim read on something disclosed in the reference,                
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007