Ex Parte Thomson et al - Page 2


         Appeal No. 2004-1383                                                       
         Application No. 09/658,389                                                 


         the above-identified application.1  Claims 7, 11, 14, 16, 23, 32,          
         and 39 through 76 are also pending but remain withdrawn from               
         further consideration pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.142(b)(2003)                  
         (effective Dec. 22, 1959).                                                 
              The subject matter on appeal relates to a bicycle stem for            
         connecting a bicycle handlebar to a bicycle steering tube.                 
         According to the present specification (page 4, line 4 to page             
         5, line 9), the present invention includes a fastener receiving            
         passageway that is offset in relation to the axis of an                    
         imaginary cylinder defined by certain portions of steering tube            
         clamp members and that this offset relation “allows the clamp to           
         be more effective and rugged” (e.g., “a greater extent of the              
         steering tube can be engaged”).  Further details of this                   
         appealed subject matter are recited in representative claims 1,            
         4, and 15 reproduced below:                                                
                   1.  A bicycle stem for connecting a bicycle                      
              handlebar to a bicycle steering tube, the bicycle stem                
              comprising:                                                           
                   a body portion having opposing first and second                  
              ends;                                                                 
                                                                                   
              1  The examiner states that the final rejection under 35              
         U.S.C. § 112, ¶1, of claims 8, 9, 19, 28, and 33 through 38 as             
         set forth in the final Office action has been withdrawn.                   
         (Substitute examiner’s answer mailed Apr. 2, 2004, paper 25,               
         hereinafter “answer,” p. 3.)  Accordingly, this issue is not               
         before us.                                                                 

                                         2                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007