Appeal No. 2004-1395 Page 8
Application No. 09/407,053
nothing therein which makes up for the deficiencies of Carlston and Magowan
discussed above with respect to claim 15. Independent claim 1, the only other
independent claim on appeal, contains the same limitations as claim 15 not suggested
by the combined teachings of Carlston and Magowan. Accordingly, we cannot sustain
the examiner's rejection of appealed claims 1, 3, 5 to 8, 10 to 14, 17, 18, 21 and 22
under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007