Ex Parte Wells - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2004-1425                                                        
          Application 10/113,506                                                      

          The disclosed invention pertains to a method and                            
          apparatus for controlling the access and storage of data in a               
          non-volatile memory device.                                                 
          Representative claim 22 is reproduced as follows:                           
               22. A method comprising:                                               
               receiving an encoded sequence of values by a non-volatile              
          memory device;                                                              
               storing the encoded sequence of values in storage elements             
          of the non-volatile memory device; and                                      
               decoding the stored encoded sequences of values in a                   
          decoding circuit within the non-volatile memory device.                     
          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Lawman                        6,028,445          Feb. 22, 2000              
          Collins et al. (Collins)      6,378,072          Apr. 23, 2002              
          (filed Feb. 03, 1998)                                                       
          Claims 22, 25, 31-34, 41-44 and 51-53 stand rejected                        
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure             
          of Lawman.  Claims 22-26, 31-36, 41-46 and 51-53 stand rejected             
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure             
          of Collins.  Claims 27-30, 37-39 and 47-49 stand rejected under             
          35 U.S.C. § 103(a).  As evidence of obviousness the examiner                
          offers Collins taken alone.  We note that pending claims 40 and             
          50 do not appear in any of these rejections.  Since claims 40 and           
          50 recite limitations similar to rejected claim 30, we assume the           

                                         -2-                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007