Appeal No. 2004-1430
Application 09/080,504
Whether it would have been obvious to the artisan to
apply the teachings of Tulpule to interacting tasks we cannot say
because, on this record, the arguments necessary to make such a
determination are lacking. Our holding is based only on the fact
that the operation of Tulpule does not relate to interacting
tasks as claimed.
In summary, we have not sustained the examiner’s
rejection of the claims on appeal. Therefore, the decision of
the examiner rejecting claims 1-15 is reversed.
REVERSED
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
JOSEPH L. DIXON ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MAHSHID D. SAADAT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JS/ki
-8-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007