The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HIROYOSHI YAMAGUCHI and HAJIME SHONO ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1441 Application No. 09/526,405 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before STAAB, MCQUADE and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. Per Curiam. DECISION ON APPEAL Hiroyoshi Yamaguchi et al. appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 6, 8 through 10 and 13 through 15. Claims 7, 11 and 12, the only other claims pending in the application, stand allowed.1 THE INVENTION The invention relates to an anti-submarine vehicle seat device “which can . . . prevent a vehicle occupant from slipping forward under the seat belt in case of an impact situation such 1 1 Claims 3, 7, 11 and 12 have been amended subsequent to final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007