Ex Parte LABOUREAU et al - Page 3




                Appeal No. 2004-1442                                                                                 Page 3                    
                Application No. 09/308,548                                                                                                     


                (Li)                                                                                                                           
                Laboureau                                 EP 0 561 710 A1                           Sept. 22, 1993                             
                (Laboureau '710)                                                                                                               
                Laboureau                                 FR 2 697 151                              Apr. 29, 1994                              
                (Laboureau '151)1                                                                                                              


                         Claims 28 to 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by                                       
                Hlavacek.                                                                                                                      


                         Claims 28, 29 and 34 to 36 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                              
                unpatentable over Li in view of Hlavacek.                                                                                      


                         Claims 28, 30 and 32 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                                                    
                unpatentable over Laboureau '710 in view of Hlavacek.                                                                          


                         Claim 33 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                                             
                Laboureau '151 in view of Hlavacek.                                                                                            


                         Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced by the examiner and                                         
                the appellants regarding the above-noted rejections, we make reference to the answer                                           


                         1 In determining the teachings of Laboureau '710 and Laboureau '151, we will rely on the                              
                translations of record provided by the USPTO.                                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007