Ex Parte Ingram et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2004-1477                                                        
          Application No. 09/507,183                                                  

          master account of funds in the transferor currency and which                
          debits funds from a transferor debit account in response to a               
          non-commercial communication from the transferor using a spread             
          around an exchange rate between the transferor and transferee               
          currencies.  Further details of this appealed subject matter are            
          set forth in the appealed claim which reads as follows:                     
               30. A system for facilitating money transfer from a                    
          transferor having funds in a transferor currency in a transferor            
          debit account to a transferee having funds in a transferee                  
          currency in a transferee account, comprising:                               
               a transaction computer communicating with at least the                 
          transferor via the Internet, the transaction computer being                 
          associated with a master account of funds in the transferor                 
          currency, the transaction computer debiting funds from the                  
          transferor debit account in response to a non-commercial                    
          communication from the transferor using a spread around an                  
          exchange rate between the currencies, the computer moving the               
          funds to the master account, the computer converting funds in the           
          master account to funds in the transferee currency using an                 
          exchange rate, the computer moving funds in the transferee                  
          currency into the transferee account.                                       
               The references set forth below are relied upon by the                  
          examiner as evidence of obviousness:                                        
          Potter et al. (Potter)        5,787,402           Jul. 28, 1998             
          Boesch et al. (Boesch)        5,897,621           Apr. 27, 1999             
          Downing et al. (Downing)      5,963,647           Oct.  5, 1999             
               The appealed claim stands rejected under under 35 U.S.C.               
          § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Boesch in view of Potter and            
          further in view of Downing.                                                 


                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007