The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 31 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOHN P. KANE and KARL D. SACHS ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1500 Application No. 09/736,673 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before GARRIS, PAK, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-30 which were at that time all of the claims pending in this application. On page 2 of the answer, the Examiner withdrew his prior art rejection of claims 4, 8 and 13-30, although his double patenting rejections of claims 1-30 were maintained. Subsequent to the answer, the Appellants filed a terminal disclaimer and claim amendment in an attempt to obviate thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007