Ex Parte ROSENBLATT et al - Page 3



             Appeal No. 2004-1505                                                               Page 3                
             Application No. 09/016,743                                                                               

                    In amending claim 1 to recite a “complete” antibody, appellants introduced                        
             perhaps needless confusion into the record since the specification does not appear to                    
             use the phrase “complete antibody.”  Rather, antibodies as used in the present                           
             invention are defined as follows:                                                                        
                    The term ‘antibodies’ as used herein refers to various types of                                   
                    immunoglobulin, including IgG, IgM, and IgA, and their relevant                                   
                    subclasses.  The antibodies may be monoclonal or polyclonal and may be                            
                    of any species of origin, including (for example) mouse, rat, rabbit, horse,                      
                    or human, or may be chimeric antibodies, and include antibody fragments                           
                    such as, for example, Fab, F(ab')2 ' and Fv fragments, and the                                    
                    corresponding fragments obtained from antibodies other than IgG.                                  
             Specification, paragraph bridging pages 22 and 23.                                                       
                    Thus, appellants indicate in the original disclosure of this application that                     
             antibodies used from the present invention may be antibodies that may be aptly                           
             characterized as “whole,” “intact,” “complete,” or “entire” or antibody fragments such as                
             Fab, F(ab')2 ' and Fv fragments.  Appellants argue “since the term ‘antibodies’ is defined               
             as including whole antibodies like IgG, IgM, and IgA, as well as fragments, it is apparent               
             that the phrase ‘complete antibody’ means complete in the sense of having a complete                     
             structure, i.e. an antibody structure having VH and VL domains as well as constant                       
             regions CH1, CH2 and CH3.”  Examiner’s Answer, page 13, first paragraph.                                 
                    The examiner does not dispute that the original disclosure of this application                    
             describes “whole” antibodies as well as fragments thereof.  Nor has the examiner                         
             established that one of ordinary skill in the art would have difficulty in understanding the             
             difference between a “whole” or “complete” antibody and a fragment thereof.  As we                       
             view the record, appellants have chosen to restrict their invention to the embodiment                    
             that includes a whole or complete antibody as opposed to the embodiment which                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007