Appeal No. 2004-1517
Application No. 09/765,172
lines 47-57. Therefore, we fail to find that Brisebois teaches
every element of Appellant's claims.
For the 103 rejection, we note that Brisebois fails to teach
or suggest the above limitation as required by the independent
claims. Furthermore, we fail to find that Goto provides the
missing pieces as well. Therefore, we will not sustain the
Examiner's rejection of these claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103 for
the same reasons as above.
99
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007