Ex Parte NAZARIAN et al - Page 5




                    Appeal No. 2004-1546                                                                                             
                    Application No. 09/030,989                                                                                       


                    is said to describe an adapter pod that connects a circuit board to a bus                                        
                    utilizing different coupling means for the circuit board and the bus.  The                                       
                    Examiner asserts that Omori provides power to slave devices through the                                          
                    adapter.  (Answer, p. 4).                                                                                        
                            Assuming that the Examiner’s description of the prior art is correct,                                    
                    the combination of prior art relied upon by the Examiner does not render                                         
                    the claimed subject matter prima facie obvious.  The subject matter of                                           
                    claims 16, 18 and 21 requires, inter alia, that the adapter pod includes a                                       
                    controller or means for controlling electrical power to a perfusion device                                       
                    and for generating messages for the perfusion device and a main                                                  
                    controller of the medical perfusion system.  We agree with Appellants, Brief                                     
                    page 12 and 14, that Dias and Omori do not disclose or suggest a means                                           
                    for generating messages for both to the main controller and perfusion                                            
                    device as required by claims 16, 18 and 21.  The Examiner did not rely on                                        
                    the Sites and Schenk references for teaching these limitations of the                                            
                    claimed invention.                                                                                               
                            The subject matter of claims 23 and 30 requires, inter alia, that the                                    
                    adapter pod includes a first connector coupled through a data bus to a                                           
                    communication network of a medical perfusion system, a second                                                    
                                                                -5-                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007