Ex Parte Baudendistel et al - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                                                            Paper No. 14              



                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
          Ex parte THOMAS A. BAUDENDISTEL, SANJIV G. TEWANI, MARK W. LONG,            
              JAMES E. DINGLE, LARRY M. OBERDIER, and DAVID K. LAMBERT                
                                   ______________                                     
                                Appeal No. 2004-1553                                  
                             Application No. 09/915,631                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before FRANKFORT, STAAB, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final              
          rejection of claims 1-20, all the claims currently pending in the           
          application.                                                                
               Appellants’ invention pertains to a powertrain mount having            
          a capacitive displacement sensor.  As explained on pages 3-4 of             
          appellants’ specification, an output signal of the sensor is                






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007