Ex Parte ANDERSON et al - Page 1



          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
          was not written for publication and is not binding precedent                 
          of the Board.                                                                

                                                             Paper No. 20              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       
                              Ex parte GLEN J. ANDERSON                                
                               and JAMES FOSTER KNUTSON                                
                                      __________                                       
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1578                                  
                                Application 09/204,837                                 
                                      __________                                       
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                      __________                                       
          Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and DIXON, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal of twice rejected claims 1 through 26.                
          After submission of the supplemental brief (paper number 16), the            
          examiner allowed claims 18 through 26, and objected to claims 14             

                                          1                                            




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007