The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board. Paper No. 43 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HIDEAKI UEDA, KEIICHI FURUKAWA, and YOSHIHISA TERASAKA ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1584 Application No. 09/067,746 ____________ HEARD: November 18, 2004 ____________ Before OWENS, KRATZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is decision on appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 36-45 and 48-57. Claims 36 and 48 are representative of the subject matter on appeal, and are set forth below: 36. A process for preparing an organic electroluminescent element consisting essentially of: forming a positive electrode substrate by dry etching a transparent electrode in a vacuum; dry washing said formed positive electrode substrate, the vacuum being unbroken from the positive electrode substrate forming through the dry washing, said dry washing being selected from the groupPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007