Ex Parte UEDA et al - Page 1



              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was           
              not written for publication and is not precedent of the Board.           
                                                              Paper No. 43             
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                     ____________                                      
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                     ____________                                      

                       Ex parte HIDEAKI UEDA, KEIICHI FURUKAWA,                        
                                and YOSHIHISA TERASAKA                                 
                                                                                      
                                     ____________                                      
                                 Appeal No. 2004-1584                                  
                              Application No. 09/067,746                               
                                     ____________                                      
                               HEARD: November 18, 2004                                
                                     ____________                                      
          Before OWENS, KRATZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                      
          PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.                                    

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is decision on appeal from the examiner’s final                    
          rejection of claims 36-45 and 48-57.                                         
               Claims 36 and 48 are representative of the subject matter               
          on appeal, and are set forth below:                                          
                    36. A process for preparing an organic                             
               electroluminescent element consisting essentially of:                   
                    forming a positive electrode substrate by dry                      
               etching a transparent electrode in a vacuum;                            
                    dry washing said formed positive electrode                         
               substrate, the vacuum being unbroken from the positive                  
               electrode substrate forming through the dry washing,                    
               said dry washing being selected from the group                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007