The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JAMES R.H. CHALLENGER, CAMERON FERSTAT, ARUN K. IYENGAR,
PAUL REED, GERALD A. SPIVAK, and KAREN A. WITTING
_____________
Appeal No. 2004-1585
Application No. 09/283,562
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 22.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for constructing and publishing a plurality of objects. When at
least one of the objects includes at least one fragment that
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007