The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte NIGEL VICTOR SPURR ____________ Appeal No. 2004-1599 Application No. 09/784,466 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before PAK, WARREN, and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges. PAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 7 and 15 through 21. Claims 8 through 14, the remaining claims in the present application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner as being drawn to a non-elected invention.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007