Appeal No. 2004-1671 Application No. 09/905,024 transfer containers to a conveyor system comprised of counter rotating belts. That teaching is applicable to rectangular containers generally as would be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art. I conclude, therefore, that the examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the subject matter of claims 23 and 27. Conclusion In conclusion, I would affirm the decision of the examiner with regard to the rejection of claims 1-23, 25-27, and 30 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), but I would reverse the decision of the examiner with regard to the rejection of claims 24, 25, 28, and 29. I would, therefore, affirm-in-part. CATHERINE TIMM ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) INTERFERENCES CT/dal 21Page: Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007