Appeal No. 2004-1777 Application No. 09/685,362 We further point out that the examiner does not explain why one of ordinary skilled in art would have been motivated to modify the configuration as set forth in Figure 3 of Ryan such that the third metal area and fourth metal area include a conductive connection between them. In view of the above, we therefore reverse the rejection. REVERSED THOMAS A. WALTZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) )BOARD OF PATENT ) APPEALS AND CATHERINE TIMM ) INTERFERENCES Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI ) Administrative Patent Judge ) BAP/sld 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007