The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 25
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte MICHAEL B. RODGERS, RAM M. KRISHNAN, RAY E. BEERY,
PAUL H. SANDSTROM, BILL B. GROSS, and LEWIS T. LUKICH
__________
Appeal No. 2004-1784
Application No. 09/685,372
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before GARRIS, TIMM, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent
Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1-6,
8-10, and 16-20. These are all of the claims remaining in the
application.
The subject matter on appeal relates to an endless rubber
track. With reference to the appellants’ drawing, the rubber
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007