Ex Parte Tedford - Page 5


         Appeal No. 2004-1805                                                       
         Application No. 09/928,359                                                 

         space or hole left after cutting”.  See page 286 of the Merriam            
         Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary, 10th edition.                             
              Having discussed pertinent parts of the specification and             
         having set forth a dictionary definition, with regard to the               
         term “cut out”, we now refer to the following recitation of                
         claim 1:                                                                   
              “a cut out in said free edge of said second panel,                    
              said cut out extending into said second panel past a                  
              line collinear with said free edge of said third                      
              panel”.                                                               

              Because of the indefiniteness with regard to the term                 
         “free edge”, and the phrase “a line collinear [sic,                        
         colinear] with said free edge of said third panel” (as                     
         discussed, supra), it is difficult to ascertain exactly                    
         where the cut out extends into the second panel past a line                
         collinear with the free edge of the third panel.                           
         Appellant’s discussion of this issue in the paragraph                      
         bridging pages 2-3 of the brief does not specifically                      
         explain where the cut out extends into the second panel                    
         past a line collinear with the free edge of the third                      
         panel.  Furthermore, as discussed, supra, appellant’s                      
         explanation of the phrase “a line collinear [sic, colinear]                
         with said free edge of said third panel” does not provide                  
         the needed clarity here.                                                   
              Hence, we agree with the examiner’s determination that                
         the term “cut out” is also indefinite.                                     
              In view of the above, we therefore affirm the 35 U.S.C.               
         § 112, second paragraph rejection (indefiniteness).                        






                                         5                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007